2008 (1) TMI 132

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....x<br>Shri. S.S. Kang, Vice President [Order].-1. Heard both sides. 2. The appellant filed this appeal against the order in review passed by Commissioner of Central Excise whereby penalty under Section 76, 77 and 78 of Finance Act were imposed. 3. In the present case, the demand for Service Tax of Rs.9,286/-&nbsp; along with interest was made from the appellant for providing the service of....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....that earlier the appellants were under bona fide belief that solemnization of marriage is a religious function, therefore, is not covered under the scope of Mandap Keeper.&nbsp; It is only from the date of this explanation where it has been clarified that social function including marriage is covered under the scope of Mandap Keeper.&nbsp; The contention is that in such situation as the appellants....