2007 (3) TMI 760
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....has been filed against the impugned judgment of the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) dated 12.4.2005 in Writ Petition No. 455 of 2004. Heard learned Counsel for the parties and perused the record. The petitioner has prayed for quashing the award dated 4.2.2003 published by the Special Land Acquisition Officer in respect of Renapur Medium Project at village Talegaon (Ghat). The High Court ha....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ication of the declaration and if no award is made within that period, the entire proceedings for the acquisition of the land shall lapse. In our opinion the submission of learned Counsel for the appellant is clearly correct in view of the clear provision of Section 11A of the Act. In view of Section 11A an award has to be made within two years from the date of publication of the declaration un....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....not agree. In our opinion under Section 11A what has to be seen is the date of last publication of the declaration under Section 6, and not any subsequent corrigendum to the said declaration. The only circumstance under which the period between the declaration under Section 6 and the award can be extended is mentioned in the explanation to Section 11A which states: In computing the period of tw....
TaxTMI