2010 (3) TMI 1153
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ingh ORDER PER BENCH 1. These appeals are filed at the instance of the assessee and they pertain to the assessment years 2000-2001 to 2006-2007. 2. The cases were originally posted for hearing on 29-1-2010. Partner of Shri Kailash Chand Jain & C.O., C.As, on behalf of the assessee-company, filed an application seeking adjournment on the ground that the Counsel who has to appear in this....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....on this date and merely an application was filed on the letter head of Kailash Chand Jain & Co. without any proof to show that the assessee-company had engaged Kailash Chand Jain & Co. to represent on its behalf in the abovementioned appeals. Under these circumstances, we reject the request for adjournment. 3. Since assessee did not choose to appear on the dates fixed for hearing, we assume tha....
TaxTMI