Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (6) TMI 475

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....  for the appellant  Shri Amresh Jain, D.R. for the respondent ORDER Stay application along with appeal has been filed against order in original dated 16.4.2014 in terms of which service tax demand of Rs. 1,06,73,865/-  was confirmed along with interest and penalties under management, maintenance  or repair service, construction of complex service and in respect of lat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ay Rathi  Vs. CCE, Pune-III  2013-TIOL-1806-CESTAT-MUM.  She also raised the issue of time bar. 3.  Ld. DR, on the other hand, stated that as per point No. 13 of the agreement executed between the buyers and the appellant. the appellant had the freedom to utilise these funds towards maintenance of building until the formation of the cooperative  society by the residents....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... up to the time the residents cooperative societies came into existence while in the case of Kumar Behary Rathi, CESTAT had clearly given a finding that the builder was not in the business of maintenance of immovable property.  Having regard to these facts and keeping in view that the appellant has also raised the issue of time bar which requires detailed analysis which can be taken up only ....