2016 (6) TMI 359

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., CGSC for R-1. Mr. Satish Kumar, Senior Standing counsel For R-2. ORDER 1. The Petitioner is aggrieved by the impugned order dated 22nd September 2015 passed by the Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax Settlement Commission, New Delhi ('Settlement Commission') to the extent that it imposed a penalty of Rs. 30,000 on the Petitioner. 2. The Petitioner was manufacturing ready mixed....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is stage that the Petitioner approached the Settlement Commission which by the impugned order dated 22nd September 2015 has determined the central excise duty payable by the Petitioner at Rs. 9,43,5790. The excess payment of Rs. 2,94,215 was ordered to be refunded. The penalty amount and interest paid was asked to be adjusted against the interest amount qua the excise duty determined. 4. The Co....