Supreme Court India dismisses petition in 2016, citing lack of merit. Pending application disposed.Application for issue of Notification under Section 80IA4(iii) rejected - Held that:- HC order [2015 (3) TMI 367 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] confirmed where in the writ petition was dismissed on the ground that, Inconsistencies in data and manipulation of information does not lead to evidences on the basis of which the application deserves approval.Despite giving many opportunities and substantial time for compliance, satisfactory explanation has not been filed. It has thus not been found to be a fit c... ... ... Title: Supreme Court of India - 2016 (6) TMI 56 - SC Order

Judges: Mr. Anil R. Dave and Adarsh Kumar Goel

Petitioner's Lawyers: Mr. Amar Dave, Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Mr. Ankur Saigal, Mr. Rishabh Parikh, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Mr. E.C. Agrawala

Respondent's Lawyers: Mr. N.K. Kaul, Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma, Mr. Bimal Roy Jad, Mr. Samar Singh, Mrs. Anil Katiyar

Decision: Petition dismissed, no merit found. Pending application disposed of. Application for issue of Notification under Section 80IA4(iii) rejected - Held that:- HC order [2015 (3) TMI 367 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT] confirmed where in the writ petition was dismissed on the ground that, Inconsistencies in data and manipulation of information does not lead to evidences on the basis of which the application deserves approval.Despite giving many opportunities and substantial time for compliance, satisfactory explanation has not been filed. It has thus not been found to be a fit case for notification u/s. 80IA(4)(iii) of the Act. Hence, the competent authority has decided to reject the application. Stay rejected - Decided against assessee. BALWAS REALITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. Versus CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES AND ORS.
Income Tax
2016 (6) TMI 56 - SC Order - TMI
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA - SC
Dated:- 12-1-2016
Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.7595/2015 - -
Income Tax
MR. ANIL R. DAVE AND ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For The Petitioner : Mr. Amar Dave,Adv., Mr. Mahesh Agarwal,Adv., Mr. Ankur Saigal,Adv., Mr. Rishabh Parikh,Adv., Mr. Rajesh Kumar,Adv., For Mr. E.C. Agrawala,Adv. For The Respondent : Mr. N.K. Kaul,ASG, Mr. Jaideep Gupta,Sr.Adv., Mr. Tara Chandra Sharma,Adv., Mr. Bimal Roy Jad,Adv., Mr. Samar Singh,Adv., Mrs. Anil Katiyar,Adv. ORDER We do not find any merit in this petition. The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
Case laws, Decisions, Judgements, Orders