2012 (5) TMI 694

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t : Shri M. Rajan O R D E R Per N. K. BILLAIYA, A.M.: With this appeal which the assessee has preferred against the order dated 29.05.2009 of the CIT-XIII, Mumbai for the A.Y. 2006-07 and has questioned the decision of the Ld. CIT(A) by raising the following grounds of appeals :- "1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in confirming an addition of Rs. 1,43,....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 14,46,770/- was filed by the assessee on 27.10.2006. The return was selected for scrutiny assessment and accordingly notices u/s.143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued and served upon the assessee. During the course of the assessment proceedings, it was noticed by the A.O. that the assessee owns more than one house property. The A.O. further found that the assessee has not offered income from h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sonably be expected to let out from year to year. As the assessee has taken possesssion of the property in September, 2005, the A.O. calculated the income from house property for the period from the September, 2005 to till the end of the financial year and after allowing the statutory deduction @ 30% made an addition of Rs. 1,43,325/- and in respect of shop at Mahavir Market, which was claimed to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the possession , the assessee took 3 months to complete the furniture work and immediately let out the property and accordingly pleaded that the notional value adopted by the A.O. is erroneous on the facts of the case. 6. The learned DR relied on the orders of the lower authorities. 7. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of the lower authorities. It is not in dispute t....