2015 (4) TMI 1112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....vocate, for the Appellant. Shri K. Sivakumar, Authorised Representative, for the Respondent. ORDER This ROM application has been filed by the appellant with respect to Order No. M/10912-10913/2013, dated 20-2-2014 passed by this Bench. 2. Sh. Anand Nainawati (Advocate) appearing on behalf of the appellant argued the case in the light of Order No. I/113/2015, dated 18-3-2015. It wa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d by the adjudicating authority invoking extended period. 4. Heard both sides and perused the case records. It is apparent from the grounds of appeal and the Order-in-Original dated 29-5-1995 that appellant while filing appeal with CESTAT, Ahmedabad raised the issue of time bar with respect, to demand of Rs. 30,88,632.47, confirmed by the adjudicating authority under Sec. 11A of the Centra....