Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (5) TMI 1046

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....M. Dixit, Asstt. Commr. (A.R) ORDER This appeal is directed against the Order-in-Appeal No. SB(38)38/MV/2011 dt. 22.3.3011 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) Central Excise, Mumbai Zone-I whereby the Ld. Commissioner rejected the appeal of the appellant. 2. The issue involved in the present case is that whether the appellant is entitled for Cenvat credit on the strength of debit notes i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ppearing for the appellant submits that the debit notes on which they have claimed the Cenvat Credit contains all the information as required under Rule 4A of Service Tax Rules, 1994. Therefore, the debit notes are valid documents for availing Cenvat Credit. She submits that the Ld. Commissioner has raised some shortcomings in the debit notes which is not correct for the reason that the debit note....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....) (iv) Commissioner of C. Ex. & CUS., Daman Vs. Jalaram Plastic Pack -2014 (34) S.T.R. 66 (Tri.-Ahmd.) (v) Commissioner of C.Ex., Nashik Vs. Graphite (I) Ltd.-2007 (212) E.L.T. 54 (Tri.-Mumbai) (vi) The Supreme Industries Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise LTU, Mumbai-2014-TIOL-115-CESAT-MUM (vii) Commissioner of C. Ex., Indore Vs. Gwalior Chemicals Industr....