AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) 
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter. 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (5) TMI 842
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Appellant. Shri B. Kumar Iyer, Superintendent (AR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : M.V. Ravindran, Member (J)]. - This appeal is directed against Order-in-Appeal No. PI/RKS/101/2011, dated 6-7-2011. 2. Heard both sides and perused the records. 3. On perusal of records, it transpires that the first appellate authority has rejected the appeal on the ground that the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....rks, no other alternative mode of serving the order was resorted to, as provided in Section 37B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It is also undisputed that the appellant was served upon a copy of the order-in-original on 24-2-2011, after he made various correspondence with the authorities. In our view, the stand of the first authority to hold that the order-in-original was served on the appellant ....