2005 (12) TMI 44
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ocate for the petitioners and Mr. Jitendra Malkan appearing on behalf of the respondents. RULE. Mr. Malkan waives service of rule and the petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal today. 2. On 19th September, 2005 this Court passed the following order : "1. Heard Mr. D.V. Parikh, the learned advocate for the petitioner. It is submitted that the observation to the effect that: "The ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....y the petitioner on oath in Paragraph No.13 of the petition remain uncontroverted and he has further instructions to state that the impugned Order-in-Original may be quashed and set aside and the matter may be remanded to the adjudicating authority for decision afresh. 4. In these circumstances, in light of the statement made, it is not necessary to set out facts and contentions in detail. The ....
TaxTMI