2016 (5) TMI 681
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., Advocates, for the Appellant. Shri Satish Kumar, SSC with Agrim Bhasin, Advocate, for the Respondent. ORDER This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against an order dated 9th November, 2015 passed by the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ('CESTAT') requiring the Appellant to deposit Rs. 1.75 crores as pre-deposit and report compliance by 20th January, 2016. 2. At....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....en taken note of by the CESTAT. It is pointed out that a further contention raised, but not considered by the CESTAT, is that in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in the Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Kerala v. Larsen & Turbo Ltd. - 2015 (2) SCC 461 a distinction had to be drawn between the value of goods supplied as part of the works contract and the value of the services ....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI