2016 (5) TMI 444
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., JJ. Shri Vinod Kant Srivastava, SC, for the Appellant. Shri A.P. Mathur, Rakesh Ranjan Agrawal and Suyash Agarwal, for the Respondent. ORDER We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant. 2. The appellant has proposed the following substantial questions of law :- (i) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the finding....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ii) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the respondents have indulged in clandestine removal of goods from the factory of Mohan Nagar, Ghaziabad and evaded Central Excise duty. (iv) Whether under the facts and circumstances of the case the impugned order of the Tribunal is wholly erroneous and unsustainable? 3. In our opinion the proposed ....
TaxTMI