2015 (7) TMI 1088

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., under Secretary, for the Respondent. ORDER Facts : I.       Vide RTI application dated 24-1-2015, the appellant sought information on the issues. II.      CPIO, response is not on record. III.     The First Appeal (FA) was filed on NIL, as desired information not provided. IV.    First App....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e appeal and on being queried by the Commission, as to whether respondents have provided the required information to the appellant on his RTI application dated 24-1-2015. On this very aspect, Shri Mashhood-ur-Rehman, Under Secretary seems to be not in a position to respond the query posed by the Commission. 3. The Commission again posed a query to him, as to whether appellant's FA dated NI....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of memorandum of second appeal. 5. The Commission is of the considered view that the appellant has been deprived by the respondents deliberately from having the benefits of the RTI Act 2005, even after lapse of more than five months period. Thus, the respondents have defeated the very purpose of the RTI Act, 2005 for which it was legislated by Parliament of India. It is also admitted fact ....