Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (5) TMI 222

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....etitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to release the old own used KOBELCO Hydraulic Excavator Model SK480 LC-8 detained on 15.03.2016, pursuant to the notice of the 1st respondent in Goods Detention Notice 665/15-16 dated 15.03.2016. 2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is the registered dealer under the TNVAT Act, 2006 and as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....o.AP03 TA6699 for verification and detained the Excavator, on the ground that there was a clerical error in 'Form JJ' while mentioning the TIN number of the contract. 3. The petitioner further contended that, even after production of the original certificates with the proof of evidence, the same were not considered by the 1st respondent. The petitioner also brought it to the notice of the....