Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (11) TMI 69

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....evenue raising the following substantial question of law : "(1) Whether the Assessing Officer can impose additional tax when the loss is reduced after adjustment ?" 2 The assessee filed its return showing the loss. Thereafter, an intimation  was issued under section 143(1) (a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on July 16, 1991, showing certain adjustment thereby reducing the loss declared by ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....to answer the question of law in favour of the Revenue. 5 However, we have noticed from the records that the respondent-assessee has raised a contention before the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) that the very issuance of intimation under section 143(1) (a) of the Income-tax Act, was not maintainable in view of the notice issued by the Assessing Officer on June 26, 1991, under section 143(....