TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
2016 (4) TMI 1104
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...., CGSC And Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing counsel ORDER 1. Notice. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 accepts notice. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing. 3. The Petitioner is engaged in the supply and manufacture of plastics, pressure die casting components and multiple assemblies thereof. The Petitioner applied....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....each of the licences have been placed before the Court by the Petitioner in a tabular form. It is sought to be pointed out that in respect of two of the licences dated 19th April, 2007 and 13th June, 2008, subsequent to the Adjudication Order dated 31st March 2014, the Petitioner did receive the EODC issued by the DGFT on 30th October, 2014 and 30th March, 2015 respectively. It is pointed out that....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tioner therein subsequently, the Court in the present case sets aside the Orders-in-Original dated 31st March, 2014 passed by the Adjudicating Authority in respect of two advance authorization licenses dated 19th April, 2007 and 13th June, 2008 and directs the Adjudicating Authority to consider the matter afresh in light of the Petitioner having obtained the EODC from the DGFT. 8. Turning now to ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... is stated by the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the Petitioner did not avail of the said licence at all and surrendered it by a letter dated 10th June, 2014. It is further pointed out that the DGFT wrote a letter dated 14th March, 2014 to the Commissioner of Customs in this regard and Deputy Commissioner of Customs in fact confirmed the said fact by letter dated 7th May, 2014. The Court ....