2014 (4) TMI 1128

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....T - TMI<br>KERALA HIGH COURT - HC (Judgement / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 2-4-2014<br>W.P.(C). No.6324, 6359 & 6380 OF 2014 - -<br>CST, VAT & Sales Tax<br>MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR FOR THE APPELLANT : ADVS.SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN, SRI.NIREESH MATHEW,SRI.C.C.THOMAS (SR.) FOR THE RESPONDENT : ADV. DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.), ADV. SRI.M.R.JAYAPRASAD, ADV. SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM), ADV. SRI.ANOOP.V....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....espondent. It is in the said circumstances that this writ petition has been filed challenging the provisional order of allotment which according to the petitioners is nothing but an outcome of illegal denial of their rightful claim for preferential right otherwise available to them under Rule 5(1)(a) of the Rules. The respective additional seventh respondent in these writ petitions contended that ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n, this court issued notice to the respondents and granted interim orders restraining the official respondents from confirming the sale effected in respect of the aforementioned shops. When these matters are taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioners as also the learned counsel for the party respondents in whose favour the sale was provisionally confirmed, submitted ....