Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (4) TMI 446

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Indira Sisupal, AC (AR) ORDER PER P.K.CHOUDHARY The appellant filed this appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) dated 31.08.2005, disallowing modvat credit of Rs. 13,75,483/-, for the period June, 1999 to 2000. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants manufacture goods namely thermoplastic polyurethane called "Desmopan' on job work for M/s Bayer Industrie....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....f inputs is duly recorded in what is known as Goods Receipt Notes (GRN). As and when the Appellant receives the inputs in question in its own stock, it promptly replaces the quantity taken from the BIL stock, At this stage it does not avail any credit on the inputs received.The revenue issued notice to the appellants for alleged diversion of such inputs without following the procedure under erstwh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t and on job work basis and whether the inputs in question are common ? (2) whether use of such common inputs is prohibited under the erstwhile Rules ? (3) whether invoking of extended period of time limit and imposition of penalty justified ? 4. Heard both sides. 5. The appellant was represented by Mrs. L. Mythili, Advocate, and the respondent was represented by Ms. Indira....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndly, as contended by the Counsel, under the rules there is no requirement of one to one correlation of inputs and output so long as inputs are not used for manufacture of exempted goods. Within the factory, for manufacture, the inputs can be utilised irrespective for whom the goods are manufactured. Removal within factory is not removal for home consumption from factory which alone invites revers....