2016 (4) TMI 437

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....V. Hari Babu, Additional Govt. Pleader ORDER Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the impugned proceedings of the 2nd respondent dated 2.11.2015 and consequential proceedings of the 1st respondent in R.P.No.9 of 2015 dated 20.11.2015. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....out providing an opportunity of personal hearing before cancelling the registration with retrospective effect, the impugned order cancelling registration came to be passed. Aggrieved against the order passed by the 2nd respondent, the petitioner filed a revision petition before the 1st respondent on 6.3.2015 and the said revision was dismissed on the ground that the petitioner was not in possessio....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as well as 39(15) of the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, in one line order, the Registration certificate of the petitioner got cancelled by the 2nd respondent. The 1st respondent being the revisional authority also failed to look into the provision of the act and dismissed the revision. This Court in a number of cases, directed the departmental authorities to follow the principles of natural....