2016 (4) TMI 292
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Advocate with Mr S. Sunil, Advocates For the Respondent : Mr Satish Kumar, Senior Standing counsel ORDER CM No.11997/2016 1. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. 2. The application stands disposed of. SERTA 9/2016 & CM No.11996/2016 3. This is an appeal filed by the Appellant against order No. SO/52657/2015 dated 28th July, 20....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Customs clarifying that the activity had to be treated as a works contract. It is pointed out that the above jurisdictional issue of the exigibility of the works contract executed by the Petitioner to service tax by wrongly classifying it as 'construction service', despite having been specifically urged by the Appellant before it, has not been taken note of by the CESTAT. It is pointed out that a ....
TaxTMI