2016 (4) TMI 241
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....cate AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. 1. The petitioners have invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the notices dated 20.8.2015, 1.10.2015, 9.11.2015 and 17.11.2015 (Annexure P-10 Colly) issued by Punjab Grains Procurement Corporation Limited (in short "the PUNGRAIN") directing them to depo....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ed by petitioners No.1 to 9 was not accepted by the PUNGRAIN but they were given counter offer (copy of the counter offer dated 24.2.2011 given to one of the petitioners is Annexure P-2) for construction of covered godowns under the Scheme at the lower rate which was accepted by petitioners No.1 to 9. The tender submitted by petitioners No.10 to 14 was accepted at the rate quoted by them. In pursu....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ioners, the direction was issued to the District Manager for taking over the godowns and execution of necessary agreements. In pursuance thereto, the agreements including the agreement dated 20.7.2012 (Annexure P-7) were executed. The amount as agreed between the PUNGRAIN and the petitioners is firstly paid by the PUNGRAIN to the petitioners and then the PUNGRAIN got reimbursed it from the FCI. As....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ector, PUNGRAIN, Chandigarh against the said notices, but no response has been received till date. Hence, the present writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have moved a representation dated 2.9.2015 (Annexure P- 11) to the Managing Director, PUNGRAIN, Chandigarh for releasing the storage charges of the godowns, but no action has so far been taken the....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI