Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2009 (1) TMI 867

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....uestions of law were framed for consideration :- "1. Whether the appellant/assessee can rely upon the orders passed by the Tribunal previously after having made a concession before the Tribunal that the case in hand could be decided on merits independent of any such previous decisions? 2. Whether the Tribunal could have disagreed with the decision rendered earlier by a Co-ordinate Bench of t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... assessment year 1991-92 in view of the concession made by learned counsel for the assessee before the Tribunal. 3. Hon'ble Mr. Justice Badar Durrez Ahmed took the view that the decision rendered by the Tribunal in respect of the assessment year 1991-92 could not have been overlooked while deciding the appeal for the assessment year 1992-93. Therefore, the matter ought to have been referred to ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as decided against the assessee. The controversy, therefore, needs to be resolved and judicial propriety requires that in a situation such as this the matter should be heard by a Larger Bench. 7. Under the circumstances, the two substantial questions that have been referred for decision are answered by holding that the appropriate course of action would be for Question No. 3, as framed on 24-2-....