2011 (5) TMI 977

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....5-06 is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals). 2. Grounds of appeal of the Revenue are as under "1. The Order of the CIT(A) is erroneous in law and on facts. 2. The learned CIT(A) erred in deleting the penalty ignored the fact that the assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars by not considering the disallowances as per the provisions of Sec....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unt of Rs. 9,54,000 out of web expenses in the computation of income amounts to furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. She relied on the order of the assessing officer. 4. The learned counsel for the assessee relied on the order of the CIT(A). He submitted that the assessee has not concealed any facts and the addition/disallowance out of expenses was made by applying the provisions of ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e particulars of income. It is not the case of the Department that the explanation of the assessee was without any basis or foundation. It is a case of honest difference of opinion between the assessee and the revenue regarding the disallowance made and the applicability of the provisions of S.40(a)(ia) of the Act. In these facts of the case, we hold that no case for imposition of penalty under S.....