2016 (4) TMI 129
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... under section 234E was levied prior to amendment to section 200A of the Income Tax Act. He submitted that the issue in dispute is squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the order of the ITAT passed in the case of Shri T.V. Patel Vs. DCIT, in ITA No.3242/Ahd/2015 dated 5.2.2015. He placed on record copy of the Tribunal order dated 5.2.2015. 3. We find that the Tribunal in the above order has followed order of the ITAT, Amristar Bench in the case of Sibia Healthcare P. Ltd. Vs. DCIT, ITA No.90/Asr/2015 and the Tribunal has reproduced the relevant part of the order. It reads as under: "4. We have heard the rival contentions, perused the material on record and duly considered facts of the case in the light of the applicable legal ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... the time prescribed in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to subsection (3) of section 206C, he shall be liable to pay, by way of fee, a sum of two hundred rupees for every day during which the failure continues. (2) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall not exceed the amount of tax deductible or collectible, as the case may be. (3) The amount of fee referred to in sub-section (1) shall be paid before delivering or causing to be delivered a statement in accordance with sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section (3) of section 206C. (4) The provisions of this section shall apply to a statement referred to in sub-section (3) of section 200 or the proviso to sub-section ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....c); and (e) the amount of refund due to the deductor in pursuance of the determination under clause (c) shall be granted to the deductor: Provided that no intimation under this sub-section shall be sent after the expiry of one year from the end of the financial year in which the statement is filed. Explanation : For the purposes of this sub-section, "an incorrect claim apparent from any information in the statement" shall mean a claim, on the basis of an entry, in the statement- (i) of an item, which is inconsistent with another entry of the same or some other item in such statement; (ii) in respect of rate of deduction of tax at source, where such rate is not in accordance with the provisions of this Act; (2) For the purp....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ustment could also be made in respect of the "fee, if any, shall be computed in accordance with the provisions of section 234E". There is no dispute that what is impugned in appeal before us is the intimation under section 200A of the Act, as stated in so many words in the impugned intimation itself, and, as the law stood, prior to 1st June 2015, there was no enabling provision therein for raising a demand in respect of levy of fees under section 234E. While examining the correctness of the intimation under section 200A, we have to be guided by the limited mandate of Section 200A, which, at the relevant point of time, permitted computation of amount recoverable from, or payable to, the tax deductor after making the following adjustments: ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....can only be passed within one year from the end of the financial year within which the related TDS statement is filed, and as the related TDS statement was filed on 19th February 2014, such a levy could only have been made at best within 31st March 2015. That time has already elapsed and the defect is thus not curable even at this stage. In view of these discussions, as also bearing in mind entirety of the case, the impugned levy of fees under section 234 E is unsustainable in law. We, therefore, uphold the grievance of the assessee and delete the impugned levy of fee under section 234E of the Act. The assessee gets the relief accordingly." 5. When the above judicial precedent was brought to the notice of the ld. Departmental Representat....
TaxTMI