2016 (4) TMI 95
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....spondent : Mr. S Manoharan Sundaram, AGP ORDER The petitioner has filed this writ petition, challenging the orders dated 30.09.2014 and 01.10.2014 passed by the second respondent and seeking a direction to the respondents to refund a sum of Rs. 3,05,802/- collected towards compounding fee, as per release order dated 01.10.2014. 2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner is a registere....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....released the detained goods by order dated 01.10.2014. Aggrieved against the same, the petitioner is before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the goods in question were transported accompanying the valid documents, which clearly show that the same were sent for approval and on final selection of the same, sale bill would be raised. However, without properly verify....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....l Government Pleader produced the files maintained by the department, wherein, the copies of the draft compounding notice dated 01.10.2014 and the reply dated 01.10.2014 submitted by the petitioner to the said notice expressing their willingness to compound the offence, were enclosed at pages 69 to 71 of the same. 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this Court. 6. Tho....
TaxTMI