2011 (6) TMI 828

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ndent : Mr. Pankaj R. Topani, Advocate ORDER P.C. 1. In this appeal, four questions of law raised by the revenue, which reads thus: (a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances " of the case, the Hon'ble Tribunal was justified in law in treating the project expenses amounting to Rs. 15,31,365/as revenue expenditure even though the same were connected to the new projects unde....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g the disallowance of interest to the extent of Rs. 78,00,01,958/made by the A.O. u/s 36(1)(3) of the I.T. Act in respect of new projects under construction.?" 2. As regards the first two questions are concerned, the finding of fact recorded by the Tribunal is that the said expenditure was incurred by the assessee related to the same line of business carried on by the assessee and therefore all....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....xpenses were incurred and the object sought to be achieved by incurring such expenses. In the present case, the I.T.A.T. after considering all facts on record has allowed the claim. Moreover, similar expenses allowed in the past have attained finality. In this view of the matter, in our opinion, question no.3 raised by the revenue cannot be entertained. 4. As regards the fourth question is conc....