Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2011 (12) TMI 584

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d made addition of Rs. 30,66,703/- and Rs. 8,84,881/- under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act for short) on account of failure of the assessee to deduct tax at source (TDS) under Section 194C of the Act. The CIT (Appeals) and Income Tax Appellate Tribunal have deleted the said addition. With regard to addition of Rs. 30,66,703/- the two appellate authorities have concurrently h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....g that these agents deliberately separated/bifurcated the bills and service charges were independently paid or were included in the said bills. With regard to the second addition of Rs. 8,84,881/-, the concurrent findings recorded by the CIT(Appeals) and ITAT are that the said payments were less than Rs. 50,000/- to a single party and, therefore, TDS under Section 194C was not required to be de....