Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2010 (7) TMI 1051

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.....D AGARWAL, VICE-PRESIDENT:   This is assessee's appeal against the order of the CIT(A)-XVI, Ahmedabad dated 18.01.2010 for A.Y.2007-2008 arising out of the order of the Assessing Officer passed under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 2. Ground No.1 of the assessee's appeal reads as under: "1. Ld.CIT(A) erred in law and on facts to uphold the disallowance of intere....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... loan from the relatives are without security while the loan from the bank is secured. He also pointed out that in the case of Omkarmal Gaurishanker Vs. ITO, 92 TTJ (Ahd) 223 the Tribunal held that the interest paid to the relatives at the rate of 24% is be reasonable. He also submitted that during the year under consideration, the assessee himself has charged interest from others at the rate of 1....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce of Rs. 50,000/- out of travelling expenses as personal expenses. The ld.CIT(A) ought to have deleted entire addition on this ground." 7. We have heard both the parties and perused the material placed before us. We find that during the year under consideration, the assessee claimed travelling expenses amounting to Rs. 4,29,011/-. The AO disallowed 50% of the claim because the expenses includ....