Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2007 (5) TMI 164

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ation in this case is whether Modvat credit on split air-conditioner procured by the respondents in October 1995 and used for maintaining control panel, etc. in their Mill House in proper atmosphere is admissible to them under Rule 57Q of the erstwhile Central Excise Rules, 1944. Learned SDR representing the appellant relies on the following decisions :- (i) CCE, Meerut v. Majestic Auto Ltd. - ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... E.L.T. 398 (Tribunal) [whwrein air-conditioners which were used to provide a desired environment for manufacture goods were held to be not eligible for Modvat credit under Rule 57Q]. Learned SDR, reiterating one of the grounds raised in the appeal, also submits that the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Jawahar Mills Ltd. [2001 (132) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.)] is distinguishable on facts and hence....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....stries Ltd. v. CCE, New Delhi - 2002 (150) E.L.T. 570 (Tri.- Del.), wherein the decision in Shriram Needle Bearing Industries (supra) was followed and capital goods credit allowed in respect of air-conditioner used for controlling and conditioning air temperature for the purpose of manufacturing final product. 2. After considering the submissions and the case law cited before me, I find that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e judgment reported in 2001 (132) E.L.T. 3 (S.C.). According to the appellant, the case of Jawahar Mills Ltd. (supra) decided by the apex court [2001 (132) E.L.T. 3] is distinguishable and inapplicable. This case of the Revenue cannot be accepted inasmuch as a Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Shriram Needle Bearing Industries (supra) has held Jawahar Mills (supra) to be applicable to ai....