2016 (3) TMI 1001
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....: Mr.P. Ayyamperumal For the Respondents : Mr. A. P. Srinivas Standing Counsel ORDER The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in Order-in-Appeal No.10/2014 (M-ST) dated 1.12.2014 and quash the same and further direct the first respondent to decide the case on merit. 2. The case of the pet....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 4. The learned counsel, in support of his contention, relied upon a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court reported in 2011 (273) ELT 345 (S.C) (Kranti Associates Pvt Ltd vs Masood Ahmed Khan), wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a quasi-judicial authority must record reasons in support of its contentions and in the absence of any reasons given by the authority, the same is liable ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o condone the delay of filing an appeal being the period of three months, prescribed under Sec.85 of the Finance Act 1994. Further, the learned Standing Counsel relied on a judgment of Division Bench of this Court reported in 2015 (37) S.T.R 187 (Mad) (Albert & Company Pvt Ltd vs Commissioner of Service Tax, Chennai), wherein, the Division Bench of this Court, while rejecting the contentions of th....
TaxTMI