2016 (3) TMI 885
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... For The Respondent : Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Addl.A.G.Punjab with Ms. Sudeepti Sharma, DAG, Punjab Ajay Kumar Mittal,J. CM No.973 CII of 2016 1. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for condonation of delay of 45 days in filing the appeal. 2. Notice of the application was given to the respondent. For the reasons stated in the application and after hearing le....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f 124 days should have been condoned as the same occurred because of the death of the representative of the company? iv) Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the order Annexure A.6 is contradictory and perverse?" 4. A few facts relevant for the decision of the controversy involved as narrated in the appeal may be noticed. The appellant sold frozen lemon concentrate to M/....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Vide order dated 4.6.2013, Annexure A.3, the DETC(A) dismissed the appeal. The said order was received on 14.8.2013 by Vinod Kumar Grover, representative of the company who was dealing with the matter. Before the appeal could be filed in the Tribunal, Mr. Grover expired on 8.10.2013. Mr. Rajesh Chhabra took over the charge on the demise of Mr. Grover. In this way, there was delay in filing the app....
TaxTMI