2016 (3) TMI 876

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cates For the Respondent : Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate ORDER Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. (Oral) Mr. Vishal Mohan, learned counsel for the appellant(s), stated at the Bar that the issue involved in all these four appeals is similar and the Punjab and Haryana High Court in a batch of ITAs, ITA No. 261 of 2012, titled as The Commissioner of Incom....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....titled as Neon Laboratories Limited versus Medical Technologies Limited and others, reported in (2016) 2 Supreme Court Cases 672, has directed that every High Court must give due deference to the law laid down by other High Courts. It is profitable to reproduce para 7 of the judgment herein: "7. The primary argument of the Defendant-Appellant is that it had received registration for its trademark....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sful in being granted an injunction as recently as on 31.3.2012. We may reiterate that every High Court must give due deference to the enunciation of law made by another High Court even though it is free to charter a divergent direction. However, this elasticity in consideration is not available where the litigants are the same, since Sections 10 and 11 of the CPC would come into play. Unless rest....