Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2016 (3) TMI 783

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he Appellants : Shri Ranjan Khanna with Shri Amresh Jain, ARs For the Respondent : Shri Rupendra Singh, Adv ORDER Per R K Singh Revenue's appeal is against the order-in-original dated 30.11.2011. Revenue has contended that primary adjudicating authority dropped the demand under erection, commissioning or installation service by holding that service was rendered under composite cont....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ntracts were pure sweat contracts involving no supply of goods and therefore the service tax would be leviable under ECIS. 2. Ld. Advocate for the respondent contended that all the contracts were works contracts and in the light of the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Larsen & Toubro Ltd. holding that works contracts were be liable to service tax prior to 1.6.2007, the Revenue's appeal....