2007 (8) TMI 167
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore. 2.The appellants are a 100% E.O.U. working under the STP Scheme. Revenue initiated action against them on the ground that they were sharing the imported/procured duty free Capital goods in contravention to the conditions of Notification No. 52/2003-Cus. dated 31-3-2003 and Notification No. 22/2003-C.E. dated 31-3-2003. The Adjudicating authorit....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....h Chander Kumar, learned Advocate appeared for the appellants and Shri Anil Kumar learned JDR for Revenue. 4.Heard both the sides. While the learned DR reiterated the impugned order on the basis of para-wise comments given by the Revenue on the 'Grounds of Appeal' of the appellants, the learned Advocate pointed out that the show cause notice has alleged violation of conditions of Notification N....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd that the goods which were in the premises shared by the customer of the appellants had already been debonded on payment of appropriate duty. Moreover, the Adjudicating authority has demanded the duty foregone on the entire goods imported and procured locally. While the Show Cause Notice was invoked the Notification issued in 2003, it is seen that the Adjudicating authority has given a fin....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI