2016 (3) TMI 429
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges two orders Annexure J and Annexure N to the petition dated 6th June, 2014 and 27th August, 2014, both passed by the second respondent. The grievance of the petitioner-company is that it is engaged in the business of carriage of time sensitive documents, parcels from one place to another, warehousing and logistics on international and ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....s told that the file is under process and the petitioner must not transact any business at the Courier Terminal at Mumbai till further orders. 6. There were certain instances and incidents in which enquiries revealed that imports contrary to the mandate of the Act and Rules had taken place and somebody associated with the petitioner played an active role therein. 7. Though the petitioner's s....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....the so-called enquiry and the application for renewal. This is an infraction of the regulations and particularly the exercise of the power set out in the manner therein. The respondents would now correct themselves and pass a fresh order after issuance of the show cause notice. This show cause notice would contain the relevant allegations and reference to material documents. It would also put the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....be furnished to this show cause notice. 12. Mr. Jetly on further instructions states that after the detailed reply to the show cause notice is issued, a composite order would be passed within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such reply and which would deal and dispose of the prior enquiry as also the request to renew the registration for a period of ten years as made by ....