Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2015 (8) TMI 1261

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ining to assessment year 2003-04. 2. In this appeal, the assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:- "1. Against addition of Rs. 905,515/- as deemed dividend U/S 2(22)(e) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Act). The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) -17, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as CIT (A)] has erred in upholding the addition of Rs. 905,515/ - made by the Assessing Officer ('AO') u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act ignoring the facts of the case. The CIT (A) should have appreciated that the said amount represents following: a. Rs. 900,000/- being repayment of loan advanced by the appellant to Tainwala Trading and Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. (TTIC) on 1st April 2009. b. Rs. 5,515/- being rental i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as at 31st March 2010. The appellant humbly prays that the impugned addition made by the CIT(A) be deleted, in the interest of natural justice." 2. The appellant before us is a company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and is inter-alia, engaged in the business of investment in movable and immovable assets and buying, selling, marketing and dealing in all kinds of fashion products and commission agency. For the year under consideration it filed a return of income,declaring an income of Rs. 10,25,26,780/- which was subject to scrutiny assessment, wherein the total income was determined at Rs. 10,65,59,300/-. The addition made to the returned income, and which is subject matter of controversy before us, is an....