2014 (2) TMI 1245

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....J SHAH   For the Respondent : MR MR BHATT And MRS MAUNA M BHATT ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. The assessee is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ("the Tribunal" for short) raising following question for our consideration:- "Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in not de....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... for the assessee vehemently contended that the Tribunal ought not to have remanded the proceedings and no disallowance could have been made under section 14A of the Act, in view of the material on record. 3. He pointed out that earlier the authorities had applied rule 8D, which was previously approved by the Bombay Tribunal in case of Income Tax Officer vs. Daga Capital Management Pvt. Ltd. re....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pplied to the case which arose prior to the introduction of said rule. Nevertheless and more so, therefore, a need would arise to ascertain the disallowance of expenditure, if any, and if so, to what extent be made for the assessee to earn tax exempt income. Since this exercise was not done previously, the Tribunal was within its right to require the Assessing Officer to do so. It is true that in ....