Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2007 (8) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ector General of Inspection twice a year. Regulation 8(2) of the Regulations postulates not only a written examination but also an oral examination. Consequently, on reading of Regulation 8(1) and Regulation 8(2) of the Regulations, the written examination as well as the oral examination is required to be conducted twice a year. Regulation 8(1) and Regulation 8(2) of the Regulations read as follows : - "8. Examination of the applicant. - (1) Any applicant whose application is received within the last date specified in the notice or publication, as the case may be, referred to in regulation 4 and who satisfied the requirements or regulations 5 and 6 shall be required to appear for the written as well as oral examination conducted by the D....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n but fails in the oral examination linked to it, shall have to clear the oral examination within two years of the related written examination irrespective of the number of chances, and if he fails to do so, he shall be treated as having failed in the examination." 7. Despite the above Regulations the Petitioner was called for an oral examination only once in 2006 after she had cleared the written examination on 20th April, 2005. With the rejoinder-affidavit, the Petitioner has placed the documents to show that further oral examination was held on 8th December, 2006 for which again the Petitioner was not called. 8. But be that as it may, the admitted position is, and we say so because the Respondents have in their counter affidavit in....