2016 (2) TMI 785

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... For the Petitioner : Shri Shiladitya Dass, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri R.K. Grover, DR ORDER PER B. RAVICHANDRAN: This appeal is against the order dated 31.12.2010 of Commissioner (Appeals)-I, Jaipur. 2. The brief facts of the case are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of PVC coated wire & cables liable to central excise duty. They were availing cenvat cred....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... that the investigation against KPIL was mainly based on the statements given by the Director of KPIL and various transporters. He submitted that the Director of KPIL was asked to state whether he actually supplied PVC compound on payment of duty to the buyers as per the list shown to him. Ld. Counsel submitted that till now, it is not clear as to whether their name is figuring in the said list. H....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....tor of KPIL will have relevance to the appellant's case. A list of buyers was shown to the Director, who stated that he never specifically cleared any goods to them. In the absence of clear evidence to the effect that the appellant is one of the persons listed and as confirmed in the statement, the main basis of the case stands un-substantiated. Regarding the investigation conducted by the Departm....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... raw materials consumption was not made at the buyers (appellants end). In fact a perusal of the impugned order will show that the main reason for denial of credit to the appellant is the various statements given by the transporters, denying the use of their vehicles for any transport to KPIL. In this connection, it is relevant to note that the appellants have relied on GR forms with rubber stam....