Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful)

TaxTMI AI Drafter workflow from input facts to final legal draft Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 678

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....hri R.K. Mishra Per Ashok Jindal: The appellant has filed these appeals against the impugned orders on the charge of under-valuation. 2. The facts of the case are that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Iron and steel castings and parts of railways. The appellant is clearing these goods to the independent buyers as well as to the Railways. These goods are tested by RITES and t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... without inspection, their goods are saleable in the open market. Therefore expenses reimbursed by the Railways towards testing charges by RDSO are not includible in the assessable value. To support this contention, he relies on the decisions of the Tribunal in the case of Hindustan Development Corporation Ltd. Vs. CCE, Calcutta reported in 1996 (85) ELT 58 (Tribunal), which has been affirmed by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... To support his contention, he relies on the decisions in the case of Hindustan Gas & Industries Ltd. Vs. CCE, Baroda reported in 2001 (133) ELT 481 (Tribunal-Mumbai),  Commissioner of Central Excise, Raipur Vs. Surya Alloys Industries (P) Ltd. reported in 2015 (316) ELT 104 (Tribunal-Delhi) and Commissioner of Central Excise, Tamil Nadu Vs. Southern Structurals Ltd. reported in 2008 (229) EL....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in the assessable value or not. Both the sides have produced case laws in defence of their pleadings as discussed hereinabove. The issue is based in the case laws are that if the goods are not sellable without any testing done by the assessee, in that case, the testing charges are includible in the assessable value as after testing/inspection the goods are marketable. But in a case where the test....