2013 (5) TMI 867
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... E R PER N.K. BILLAIYA, AM: The revenue has challenged the correctness of the order of the CIT(A)-4 Mumbai order is dated 14.03.12 and pertains to AY 2008-09. 2. The sole grievance of the revenue is that the CIT(A) has erred in deleting the addition of Rs. 17,90,191/- made u/s 43B on account of disallowance of Employees Contribution to Provident Fund. According to the revenue, the payment....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....o made is deserved to be allowed. 5. The assessee relied upon certain judicial decisions to support its claim. Relying upon the decisions of Hon'ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of BDPA Software 340 ITR 375, the CIT(A) allowed the claim of the assessee. Revenue is before us against this finding of the CIT(A) 6. Ld. DR supported the assessment order relying upon the decision of the T....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....r of the assessee by the decision of the Hon'ble Delhi High Court in the case of CIT vs. P M Electronics Ltd. 177 Taxman page -1 wherein the Hon'ble Delhi High Court had the occasion to decide the following substantial questions of law. "(a) Whether amounts paid on account of PF/ESI after 'due date' are allowable in view of section 43B, read with section 36(1)(va) of the Act? (b) Wheth....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....pra). Judicial discipline requires us to follow the view of the Supreme Court in Vinay Cement Ltd.'s case (supra) as also the view of the Division Bench of this Court in Dharmendra Sharma's case (supra). 13. In these circumstances, we respectfully disagree with the approach adopted by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Pamwi Tissues Ltd.'s case (supra). 14. In these circumstances i....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI