2013 (11) TMI 1613

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....C.A., for the Appellant. Shri V.P. Batra, Authorized Representative (DR), for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Archana Wadhwa, Member (J)]. - After hearing both the sides we find that the appellant is engaged in the manufacture of Shoddy woollen yarn and synthetic shoddy yarn of Chapter sub-heading 5106.11 and 5509.90 of the Schedule to Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. 2. The pr....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he appellant does not stand considered by the original Adjudicating Authority who by adopting assessable value as 115% cost of the goods confirmed the duty of Rs. 5,04,359/- and also imposed penalty of identical amount. 3. On appeal against the above order, Commissioner (Appeals), called for a verification report from the Superintendent and observed that if the invoice value in different v....