2014 (12) TMI 1205

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... as per G.N.2 & 3 below, since, not emanating from search seized material, therefore, should be deleted. ii) That the lower authorities grossly erred in law as well as on merits in making and sustaining ad-hoc addition of Rs. 1 lac by estimating foreign traveling expenses. iii) That under the facts and circumstances, the addition of Rs. 5,72,300/- as unexplained cash deposited in bank on 05.01.2005 is absolutely illegal, unjustified and unsustainable in law as well as on merits." 2. At the outset, Ld. A.R. submitted that the case of the assessee was reopened due to search and seizure operation on 19.02.2008 and the assessment in this case was completed u/s 153A and two additions relating to cash deposits in bank and on ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... I.T.A.No. 3184/Del/2013 vi) PACL India Ltd. I.T.A.No. 2637/Del/2010 vii) Kusum Gupta I.T.A.No. 3312/Del.2009 viii) MGF Automobiles Ltd. I.T.A.No. 4212/Del/2011 ix) Vee Gee Industrial Enterprises I.T.A.No. 1/Del/2011 x) Asha Kataria I.T.A.No. 3105-3107/Del/2011 xi) Merigold Merchandise (P) Ltd. I.T.A.No. 2666/Del/2013 xii) Pradeep Kumar I.T.A.No. 4016/Del/2011 xiii) ACIT Vs Manoj Narain Aggarwal 99DTR (Del.) (Trib) 279 xiv) Parivar Properties (P) Ltd. I.T.A.No. 1011/Del/2013 xv) Inlay Marketing (P) Ltd. I.T.A.No. 4200/Del/2012 xvi) V K Fiscal I.T.A.No. 5460/Del/2013 xvii) Parsvnath Devleopers Ltd. VS DCIT 5188/Del/2013 xviii)....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Rs. 5,72,300/-, Ld. A.R. submitted that the amount was deposited out of shagun collected on the occasion of marriage of his son and in this respect, our attention was invited to paper book page 16 where a copy of invitation card was placed. We were also taken to pages 18-27 where complete list of persons who had given shagun were placed. Specific attention was invited to page 27 where it was mentioned that two gifts were received through cheques for which no addition was made. It was submitted that details were submitted before authorities below but they have rejected the claim without assigning any sound or legal reason. It was further submitted that marriage expenses as incurred by assessee were accepted whereas the gifts received on the....