2016 (2) TMI 135

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Mr. S. Manoharan Sundaram, Additional Government Pleader ORDER This Writ Petition is filed, seeking to quash the proceedings, dated 30.09.2015, passed by the respondent in TIN No.33951465239/2013-14. 2. The petitioner-Company, a trader in Oil seeds, edible oil etc, is the registered dealer in the books of the respondent under TNVAT Act as well as CST Act. An inspection was conducted by t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was forced to seek the said details. Despite the same, order, dated 30.09.2015 was passed. The learned counsel further submitted that, when the petitioner is handicapped without being furnished the copies of the documents, which formed the basis for passing the impugned order, there was no point for the petitioner in appearing before the respondent to putforth their defence. Unless and otherwise, ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....furnished, despite specific request was made. This Court finds considerable force in the stand taken by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 6. Therefore, this Court, by setting aside the impugned order, dated 30.09.2015, directs the respondent to furnish the documents, which were collected from the Customs Department and relied upon by the respondent in passing the impugned order,....