Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2016 (2) TMI 22

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ELLANT : MS AMEE YAJNIK, ADVOCATE ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) The adjudicating authority as well as the Commissioner (Appeals) relied almost entirely on confessional statements made by the assessee and other employees of the assessee in order to confirm the demand. The Tribunal by the impugned order reversed the orders on the ground that solely on the basis of confes....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....efore the lower adjudicating authority appellant has taken plea referred at para 14.3 above and argued that the evidences from the buyers end had to be proved. When appellant had argued before the lower adjudicating authority that invoices at page 34, 35, 52, 53, 54, 56, 58 were trading invoices they could have submitted the documentary proofs of their purchase of the said goods. From where they h....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s but were dispatching goods to different small local contractors, It is only after the statement of Shri Dilip B. Waghela Production/Dispatch incharge of the appellant company, investigation was extended to the end of M/s. L & T and M/s. Jyoti Engg & Contractors. Statements of these parties are independent statements. Why should they tell lie as claimed by the appellant that 'if the buyers ha....