2015 (6) TMI 986
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Respondent. ORDER The applicant has filed an application of rectification of mistake in the order passed by this Tribunal on 21-10-2014. 2. Heard the ld. Counsel for the applicant who submits that the applicant has contested the liability of duty on account of non-accountal shortage of goods found at the time of inspection while weighment was done on estimate basis. It is also contested ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....msp;Heard the ld. Counsel for the appellant and perused the records. 4. On perusal of the records I find that this Tribunal has passed the following order : "It is contested by the ld. Counsel that when Commissioner (Appeals) has reduced penalty from Rs. 3,78,619/- to Rs. 50,000/- this clearly shows that there is no clandestine removal of the goods in question. 2. Record reveals tha....