2016 (1) TMI 684
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....assessee against the order dated 09.03.2015 of CIT(A)-Asansol relating to A.Y.2008-09. 2. The assessee is an individual. During the previous year relating to A.Y.2005-06 the assesse filed the return of income declaring Long Term Capital Gain on sale of shares of Rs. 12,32,025/-. The AO issued an intimation u/s 143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) dated 03.02.2010 accepting the income return....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... revised return of income claiming exemption of long term capital gain u/s 10(38) of the Act. The CIT(A) relied on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Goetze (India) Ltd Vs CIT 284 ITR 323 (SC) and was of the view that the assessee cannot make a claim which is not supported by a revised return of income. He therefore held that the AO rightly dismissed the application of the as....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....er of the AO u/s 154 of the Act. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in it's decision rendered in the case of Goetze (India) Ltd vs CIT has clarified that the appellate authorities under the Act have the power to consider the claim even if the business of the revised return of income. In my view, therefore, the claim of the assessee that Long Term Capital Gain is exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act has to be exami....
TaxTMI