Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2013 (3) TMI 656

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....his appeal by the Revenue for assessment year 2008-09, although several questions have been formulated in the memo of appeal, the basic dispute is whether the Tribunal was justified in deleting the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 levied upon the respondent - assessee by the assessing officer. 3. The respondent - assessee had originally filed its return of income clai....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....was levied upon the respondent - assessee by the assessing officer. The Commissioner of Income Tax (A) upheld the order of the assessing officer levying penalty. 4. On further appeal, the Tribunal deleted the penalty as it found that this was a case of bona fide clerical error while computing the tax liability in the process of filing its return of income. However, as the same was rectified by ....