2012 (10) TMI 1031

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Counsel, for the Respondent. ORDER Issue notice. 2. Mr. Satish Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent and states that he has instructions to appear in this matter and further submits that the matter may be disposed of. 3. The appellant urges the following substantial question of law i.e. "whether the Tribunal by its order dated 19-7-2012 fell i....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-Book. The Tribunal, however, rejected the request and even vacated the interim order made previously on 5-11-2007 observing as follows : - "4. The ground stated in the adjournment application does not appeal to keep the appeal pending where huge duty demand is blocked and such demand followed by interest and penalty. Appellant has no right to seek adjournment in such situation, foll....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ed to make deposit of the rest of the demand of duty within 8 (eight) weeks from today to protect interest of revenue and make compliance on 29th October, 2012." 4. It is urged that the Tribunal's order is extremely prejudicial and even though the request was considered to be reasonable yet the imposition of the condition by way of vacation of the previous order is extremely harsh and prej....